Introduction: Cabins in the northern parts of Minnesota and Wisconsin are a great way to vacation in the summer. People go up there all the time to hunt, fish, and get away from the city life or to take a break from work. Great aspects of cabins are ones located in forests, near bodies of water, and not too close to major cities. All of these characteristics are viable to make a map for possible cabin locations in Wisconsin. My particular areas of interest were in northwest Wisconsin. People that are interested in this could be realtors, cabin investors, people looking to buy a cabin, or even me. I would eventually like to have a cabin some day so I can take my family up there and have a nice 4th of July vacation.
Data Sources: In order to make a map of these possible locations, I needed some data. I would need: cities and counties of Wisconsin, forests, lakes and streams, census data, and DNR deer harvest information. All the Wisconsin land data I got was from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources in their fire protection metadata folder, except for the deer harvest information. I got that from ArcGis online (http://services1.arcgis.com/do3Qqawv5p1BzFow/arcgis/rest/services/DeerHarve
st2015upload/FeatureServer). The census data about city population came from ESRI online and were downloaded onto ArcMap 10.3.1. Some concerns I have about this data is the availability of land. The data did have a lot of forest land available on the map, but not all of it is available for the public or to buy. Many of it could be privately owned, which means it would not be available for cabin use. This is okay though, because all I am showing are suitable locations for possible cabins in northwest Wisconsin.
Methods: In order to answer my question, I needed to locate the forests of Wisconsin. I wanted the cabins to be in the forests so all I had to do was leave the forests feature class alone. If the cabins were going to be nice for fishing, they would have to also be near a stream or a lake, so I made a 500 meter buffer around all the streams and lakes. Hunting was my next priority. If the land was going to have good hunting, then you would assume it would have a high deer harvest. So I used the data from the DNR deer harvest of 2015 and found the top half of those areas. I also did not want the cabins withing a 50 kilometer distance of a large city, so that was another buffer and an erase later on. In the end, I used an intersect and came up with the areas that you see on the map in the results. Below, is a picture of the data flow model suited for these steps.
 |
Data flow model
Results: The results of my project were to be as expected. I was actually surprised with how much of an area the possible cabin locations took up. I was expecting a smaller area and was quite pleased to see that their was lots of land cover. If you look on the map below, you can see that I focused mainly on Douglas, Bayfield, Burnett, Washburn, and Sawyer counties. The cabin areas are long and narrow, because most of them are following along the stream and lake buffer. The cabins far to the north would also be near the border of Lake Superior as well.

Evaluation: I really enjoyed working on this project more than working on the previous projects because this one meant a lot more to me. It was something that I chose and was really interested in and wanted to learn about. I thought it was fun to see possible locations for cabins in the future and really enjoyed the process of making the map. If I were to do this project over again, I would like to find available forest land for sale and not just all forest lands. That way, if I were to actually think about buying a cabin, it would be a more suitable map. It would show places that could actually be occupied right away, it would make the project more real and not so spacial. In order to do that, I would have to look at real estate places and see if they have metadata I could download. If no data is available at all, I could enter the data in myself and then use my own geodata to make the map more accurate. Some challenges I faced during this project were finding suitable land type. I really wanted to find land use of all kinds and not just use forests, so I could possibly have a cabin that's near a river or stream but is not into a forest, but it was just too hard to find the data and use the pertinent information. All in all though, it seemed to be a really good and exciting project which I really enjoyed working on.
The map was made in ArcMap 10.3.1
Data flow model was made in PowerPoint
All data came form Wisconsin DNR or downloaded from ESRI online.
|